I would similar to to assimilate the authorised fact for AT&T to need a patron to take the interpretation devise with an iphone. specificaly, if a patron acquired an iphone from a former ATT customer (i.e., paid for on ebay an iphone which was no longer on contract), and simply put in their existent voice-only SIM card, what authorised drift does AT&T have to need the patron to take the interpretation service?
Â
in this ‘hypothetical’ box the patron has the 3G incited off and is only regulating the GSM voice network connection. the iphone is being used only as any alternative elementary voice phone would after the SIM label installed. All internal applications run (cocntacts, games, etc), though no interpretation use alternative tha Wi-Fi connection.
Â
several pass authorised rulings over the final 100 years have determined which the phone association can not tie the use to the device foul and this would appear to request here.  seems equivalent to charging otherwise rates for Samsung contra Motorola phones with same capability.
Â
I assimilate the AT&T believes and states “it is required” though i am perplexing to assimilate either any one has genuine interpretation and info on the authorised drift for AT&T’s on all sides here.
Â
thanks

